Functional and Surgical Outcomes of Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Neurosurgical Centre in Upper Egypt (2022–2024)
Schlagwörter:
Spasticity, Pump Implantation, Surgical Outcomes, Functional Neurosurgery, Baclofen, Spinocerebellar DegenerationAbstract
Background: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pump therapy is a well-established intervention for refractory spasticity. Its effectiveness depends not only on pharmacological action but also on surgical precision and multidisciplinary care. Methodology: We retrospectively reviewed 15 adult patients (mean age 45.3 ± 11.9 years) with refractory spasticity due to multiple sclerosis (9/15, 60%), cerebral palsy (2/15, 13.3%), hereditary spastic paraparesis (2/15, 13.3%), spinocerebellar degeneration (1/15, 6.7%), and stroke (1/15, 6.7%). Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, central spasticity unresponsive to oral medications and physiotherapy, significant functional impairment, and positive ITB test dose. Exclusion criteria: age <18 years, severe fixed contractures, uncontrolled infection, progressive systemic illness precluding surgery, or negative test trial. Functional outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Penn Spasm Scale (PSS), Numeric Pain Scale (NPS), and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Surgical details and complications were also recorded. Results: Spasticity and pain improved significantly and consistently across measures. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) decreased from 2.9 ± 0.9 to 1.1 ± 0.6 at 12 months, indicating a mean reduction of 1.8 points (95% CI, 1.2 - 2.4; p < 0.001). Spasm frequency (PSS) declined by 1.6 points (95% CI, 1.0–2.1; p < 0.001), and pain intensity (NPS) fell by 4.3 points (95% CI, 3.4–5.2; p < 0.001). Nearly half of the cohort (47%) achieved an improvement of at least one GMFCS level, and 67% surpassed their preoperative functional goals on Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Regression analysis revealed that a younger age (β = –0.03, 95% CI –0.05 to –0.01; p = 0.006) and a shorter disease duration (β = –0.02, 95% CI –0.04 to –0.001; p = 0.041) are significant predictors of increased tone reduction. Complications occurred in 27% of patients, predominantly catheter-related, with no systemic adverse events. Conclusion: ITB pump implantation delivers sustained reduction in spasticity, spasms, and pain, alongside meaningful functional gains in mobility and caregiving ease. Surgical techniques—particularly pump pocket creation, catheter stabilisation, and wound closure—were shown to be critical in minimising complications and preserving long-term efficacy. Beyond scale-based improvements, patients experienced enhanced comfort, improved sleep, and reduced caregiver burden.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Sindou M, Brinzeu A, Georgoulis G. Neurosurgical lesioning procedures for spasticity and focal dystonia. Neurophysiology in Neurosurgery: Elsevier; 2020. p. 499–513.
Elbasiouny SM, Mushahwar V, McVea DA, et al. Spasticity after spinal cord injury: neuronal mechanisms and current treatment options. Front Neurol. 2010;1:149.
Zeng H, Chen J, Guo Y, Tan S. Prevalence and risk factors for spasticity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2021;11:616097.
Becker WJ, et al. Spasticity in multiple sclerosis: prevalence, impact, and management. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;17:9–15.
Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: current understanding and future directions. Front Neurol. 2021;12:701–709.
Albright AL, Ferson SS. Intrathecal baclofen therapy in children. Neurosurgical focus. 2006;21(2):E3.
Ammar A. Intrathecal baclofen therapy for treatment of spasticity and dystonia in childhood: University of Nottingham; 2018.
Meythaler JM, Steers WD, Tuel SM, Cross LL, Sesco DC, Haworth CS. Intrathecal baclofen in hereditary spastic paraparesis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1992;73(9):794–7.
van der Gaag SM, Frankema SP, van der Ploeg ES, Baart SJ, Huygen FJ. Evaluating community-based intrathecal baclofen therapy: effectiveness, safety, and feasibility. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024 Mar 22;13(7):1840.
Skogberg O, Samuelsson K, Ertzgaard P, Levi R. Changes in body composition after spasticity treatment with intrathecal baclofen. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017;49(1):36–9.
-Mathur SN, Chu SK, McCormick Z, Chien GCC, Marciniak CM. Long-term intrathecal baclofen: outcomes after more than 10 years of treatment. PM&R. 2014;6(6):506–13. e1.
Kaye AD, Cheon SY, Roque MH, Gibbs C, Mott KR, Wandler AM, et al. Efficacy, Indications, and Safety of Intrathecal Baclofen Pump: A Narrative Review. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 2025;29(1):1–10.
Masrour M, Zare A, Presedo A, Nabian MH. Intrathecal baclofen efficacy for managing motor function and spasticity severity in patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC neurology. 2024;24(1):143.
Otero-Luis I, Saz-Lara A, Cavero-Redondo I, Pascual-Morena C, Martínez-García I, de Arenas-Arroyo SN. Effectiveness of the intrathecal baclofen pump in the treatment of spasticity of different aetiologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurología. 2025.
Motta F, Antonello CE, Stignani C. Intrathecal baclofen and motor function in cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2011;53(5):443–8.
Tiefenbach J, Machado AG, Bethoux F. Uncovering the rate and risk factors of intrathecal baclofen pump–associated complications in the adult population. Neurosurgical Focus. 2024;56(6):E12.
Saulino M. The use of intrathecal baclofen in pain management. Pain Management. 2012;2(6):603–608. doi:10.2217/pmt.12.60.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2026 East African Journal of Neurological Sciences

Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.